Procedure of the application process

1: Receipt of your application

    You send us your documents or contact us on your own initiative.

    We don’t just look at stations and technologies. The degree of responsibility, decision-making share and project types in your previous career are decisive.

    If information is missing, we clarify this specifically and without long preliminary phases.

    2: Clarification of open points
    In a brief exchange, we clarify motivation, understanding of the role, availability and framework conditions.
    This step is deliberately kept compact and serves as a quick classification. If it does not fit professionally, we communicate this at an early stage.

    3: Cultural Fit Interview
    Desires, working methods and responsibilities
    This interview does not focus on professional suitability.
    We talk about:

    • Dealing with unclear requirements
    • Preparing and making decisions
    • Communication with technical decision-makers
    • Taking responsibility in complex situations

    The aim is to make a well-founded assessment of whether working methods and requirements match. At the same time, you will gain a realistic insight into the reality of our projects.

    4: Skills interview as preparation
    You will receive a clearly defined task to prepare you for the technical interview.

    The task is based on realistic project situations. It is not about perfection or scope, but about:

    • Structuring a problem
    • Prioritization
    • Derivation of decisions
    • Clear recommendation instead of a list of options

    The time required is communicated transparently and deliberately limited. Quality is created through thought structure, not through the length of the elaboration.

    5: Shoulder check
    Before the technical interview, we briefly discuss your application in advance.

    The goal is:

    • Clarify questions of understanding
    • Making assumptions transparent
    • Align expectations

    In this way, we ensure that the subsequent discussion is in-depth and that no time is wasted on misunderstandings. At the same time, we test the ability to engage in dialog and the logic of the argument.

    6: Skill interview
    We analyze your solution together in a professional interview.
    The focus is on:

    • Thought structure
    • Architectural considerations
    • Consideration of alternatives
    • Dealing with risks
    • Ability to formulate a clear recommendation


    We not only assess knowledge, but also judgment, discussion skills and the assumption of responsibility.

    Efficiency in the application process

    Efficiency is a principle for us.

    In concrete terms, this means

    • Clear communication and scheduling
    • No multiple repetitions of the same conversation content
    • Transparent time required for the task
    • Prompt feedback
    • No months-long collection of candidates

    We carry out structured checks and make consistent decisions.

    What we check in the process

    Professional
    • Structuring ability
    • Architectural thinking
    • Prioritization
    • Risk awareness
    • Decision logic
    Personal
    • Assumption of responsibility
    • Dealing with ambiguity
    • Ability to engage in dialog
    • Clarity and self-reflection
    • Professionalism in the customer context

    Questions and answers about our application process

    How much time should I allow for the task?

    The expected time required is communicated transparently and is realistically limited.

    How quickly will I receive feedback?

    Usually within a few days of the respective meeting.

    Can the process take place remotely?

    The process always takes place remotely

    Will I receive feedback in the event of a no-go?

    For most jobs, we can give you detailed feedback on request. Unfortunately, this is not possible in all countries.

    When does it not fit?

    Our environment is demanding and strongly focused on responsibility.
    It’s not a good fit if you:
    – are only looking for clearly defined implementation tasks
    – don’t want any direct exchange with technical decision-makers
    – feel more comfortable in highly predefined structures
    – prefer to avoid rather than make decisions
    – are primarily looking for maximum predictability without ambiguity

    We are looking for profiles who can deal with complexity and want to actively take on responsibility.

    How long does the application process take?

    Usually two to six weeks, depending on availability and scheduling.
    We deliberately keep the process lean and avoid unnecessary loops. As soon as we have sufficient information, we make a decision.

    What happens after a commitment?

    Once you have been accepted, we will agree the contractual details promptly and define a clear start date.

    Before your first day of work, you will receive:
    – Transparency about your first project or assignment context
    – A structured onboarding plan
    – Clear contact persons

    In the first few weeks, the focus is on:
    – Integration into ongoing projects
    – Understanding our decision-making and project logic
    – Taking on clearly defined areas of responsibility

    Our goal is a fast, structured start with early assumption of responsibility.

    How do I prepare for the first interview?

    – Reflect on specific project situations in which you have taken on responsibility.
    – Think about which decisions you prepared or made yourself and what effects they had.
    – You can use AI to prepare. It is important that you have gone through all the content yourself and can represent it independently.

    We ask intensive questions during the interview. AI answers that are not reflected quickly become visible and have a negative impact on the assessment.

    How do I prepare for the skills interview?

    – Focus on structure and argumentation.
    – Make conscious assumptions and name them.
    – Prioritize clearly and give reasons for your recommendations.
    – AI may be used as an aid. The decisive factor is that the argumentation is comprehensibly your own.

    The same applies here. We go into depth, question assumptions and check the consistency of your derivation. AI content that is adopted without reflection usually leads to inconsistent answers and is evaluated accordingly.